The Sad State of the Oceans

In Society > Environment - Posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 at 12:00am
A few hundred years ago, fishing around North America was reported to be as easy as dropping a basket into the water and pulling it back out full of fish. In 1497, the explorer Giovanni Caboto even reported that there were so many fish that they almost blocked his boat. Today, the Atlantic fisheries are collapsing and many of the once abundant species, particularly Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), are reduced to tiny fractions of their populations and are now classified as “Vulnerable” according to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN)'s “red list” and here in Canada, Atlantic cod has been considered between "Threatened" and “Endangered” by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Wikipedia reports that the cod stocks have fallen to 5% of what they once were (i.e. a 95% decrease in stocks).
Sharks are suffering due to overfishing
too. Photo Courtesy of Andrew Brigmond.
Cod is a textbook example of the dire state of the oceans due to overfishing, but a study released on March 2nd 2009 by Oceana, a link has been shown between overfishing and starvation by predators at higher trophic levels. Such predators include sharks, dolphins and sea birds. Although it may seem like no big deal to some people, such predators are necessary to maintain proper balance and interaction between the species in the food webs of the ocean. Without them, the collapse of the oceans will become faster and unavoidable.

The study points to a decline in prey stocks such as herring, mackerel, squid, anchovies and, of course, Atlantic cod. This isn't the first time scientists have warned the world about the dire state of the oceans; in their 2006 paper Dr. Boris Worm of Dalhousie University and his co-authors showed that according to the data available at the time, if human activity maintained its trends, the oceans would collapse entirely in approximately 40 years. The media reported the findings for a few days, but it was soon forgotten by the public. Although these findings may seem exaggerated and even the authors themselves admitted that some of their sources may have been less reliable, the evidence is still staggering, especially if we take into consideration that some countries probably underestimated their activities in order to appear more ecologically friendly.
Dr. Worm predicts that the oceans will be
depleted in approximately 40 years if
humans continue to overfish.


When considering the state of marine systems, it is particularly important to remember that food webs are not constrained to any one system. There is considerable overlap between the ocean food chains and terrestrial ones. The collapse of the oceans would most probably mean the collapse of coastal systems, which would in turn result in the collapse of other ecosystems through a domino effect.

The issue becomes more complicated when we consider the human implications of a collapsing ocean system. The fishing industry accounts the majority of the revenue of many coastal and island communities. Unfortunately for our oceans, these communities often feel that they have no choice, but to continue with their industry by simply changing the species they target. Instead of fishing large fish, the fishing industry has turned to fishing smaller and smaller ones, often resulting in the complete destruction of some areas of the ocean floor and ecosystem through trawling.

Here are some older articles!


Post a comment!

steffi

Posted on Wed March 4th 2009 7:10PM

Ooo as a follow up, if you must have fish, the next best thing is to try and support 'good' companies.

The Environmental Defense Fund has a "Seafood Selector" that is useful. This gives you an idea health-wise and environmental-wise about how good certain species of fish from certain areas are.

http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=1521

However, watch out for a couple inconsistencies between canned vs. fresh fish.

Steffi

Posted on Wed March 4th 2009 9:55AM

Frightening. I actually know people who are not vegetarian, but who refuse to eat seafood for this exact reason.

Dar

Posted on Wed March 4th 2009 8:30AM

Well said! I guess the best solution is for us to all become vegetarian and leave the poor fish alone! :)

Arezoo

Posted on Tue March 3rd 2009 10:08AM

Right on, Adje! This is just a tiny example of what we are doing to our environment. Soon, we won't even have grass to graze on.

Leave a comment!

Name
Comments
Human?
Please type in the word below :